Computer & Information Systems Term Project
Saturday, 2 May 2015
Apple tries to resuscitate iPad sales with new ad campaign. How will that work out?
According to the article,Apple tries to resuscitate iPad sales with new ad campaign by Lance Whitney, With Apple tablet sales dwindling, the company is hoping a new series of iPad ads will draw in more buyers. People are not exactly buying as much tablets like when the iPad was launched because, people are holding onto their tablets longer and sharing them with family members, so there's less of a need to buy new ones. And instead of purchasing both a mobile phone and a tablet, more consumers are opting to buy bigger-screened iPhones, or phablets, such as the iPhone 6 Plus with its 5.5-inch screen.
http://www.cnet.com/news/apple-tries-to-resuscitate-ipad-sales-with-new-ad-campaign/
Saturday, 25 April 2015
Health Apps. Are they helpful or not?
According to the article,Are Health Apps Harmful or Helpful? Experts Debate by Christopher Wanjek, health apps are ubiquitous, but do they do more harm than good? Some
doctors are beginning to ask whether these self-monitoring applications
are useless: or even dangerous. Health apps have a range of goals:
some simply encourage people to adopt healthy behaviors, while others
actually help people manage conditions such as diabetes or high blood pressure. There are more than 100,000 such apps available. If there is any
perceived incongruity in monitoring — a skipped heart beat, a momentary
and natural dip or rise in blood pressure, or a variation in oxygen
levels — can lead people to feel unnecessary anxiety and pursue unneeded
medical tests.
The Apple Watch
According to the article,1 Million Orders and Counting: Why So Many Covet the Apple Watch by Tanya Lewis, more than 1 million Apple Watches were pre-ordered last week, on the first day the device went on sale, according to a firm that tracks consumer spending.Based on receipt data, an estimated 957,000 people in the United States ordered an average of 1.3 watches each on Friday (April 10), spending about $503.83 per device. That's alot.
http://www.livescience.com/50485-apple-watch-mania.html
Saturday, 18 April 2015
Bio-Art: 3D-Printed Faces Reconstructed from Stray DNA
According to this article, Bio-Art: 3D-Printed Faces Reconstructed from Stray DNA by Tia Ghose, Dewey-Hagborgtook collected a bag of human leftovers to Genspace,
a community biology lab in New York City. After analyzing the DNA for
identifiable traits, she used a computer model to predict the faces of
the people who left them and used 3D printing to recreate those faces.The art reveals the wealth of personal information that could hide in seemingly anonymous pieces of trash. Dewey-Hagborg argues that this genetic information needs to be protected. She developed a way for people to wipe away their genetic traces.
The two-part product, called Invisible, consists of two chemical
solutions. The first, called Erase, removes 99.5 percent of genetic
information. The second solution, called Replace, essentially scrambles
the genetic signal by cloaking it with a kind of DNA noise.
The chemical solution is actually on sale,
and contains a mix of simple chemicals such as bleach. The recipe for
Invisible is available open-source on Dewey-Hagborg's website, biononymous.me.
Screwing Up Artificial Intelligence Could Be Disastrous, Experts Say
According to this article, Screwing Up Artificial Intelligence Could Be Disastrous, Experts Say by Tanya Lewis, science and tech heavyweights Elon Musk, Bill Gates and Stephen Hawking have warned that intelligent machines could be one of humanity's biggest existential threats. But throughout history, human inventions, such as fire, have also posed dangers. Why should people treat AI any differently?The downside is the possibility of creating a computer program capable of continually improving itself that we might lose control of. In my opinion, I think AI has its benefits and its pitfalls.
http://www.livescience.com/50467-artificial-intelligence-stakes.html
Saturday, 11 April 2015
Voice to the Voiceless
A speech prosthetic could give voice to people who can't speak, by converting their brain activity into words according to this article, Brain-Machine Interface Could Give Voice to the Voiceless by Gordy Slack. A group of San Francisco neuroscientists and engineers is developing a device that aims to figure out what people with paralysis or brain injury are trying to say by studying how they attempt to move their mouths.It would be nice to know how this turns out.
http://discovermagazine.com/2014/april/9-whats-on-your-mind
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)